BSP's Eastern Europe Program
Promoting Biodiversity Conservation in Ukraine
Introduction
With support from the USAID Mission in Kyiv, BSP initiated
a project in Ukraine in October 1995, which consisted of two
principal components: 1) a nationally-focused Conservation Initiatives
Grants Program and 2) a regionally-focused Crimean Conservation
Needs Assessment to set geographic and thematic priorities for
conserving the Crimean Peninsula's biodiversity. Local Ukrainian
advisory groups were selected to support these activities.
Both components were also designed within the context of Ukraine's transition
from republic of the former Soviet Union to becoming a new, independent nation.
Ukraine is in the midst of enormous societal change: moving into a free
market economy and converting to democratic institutions.
Most of Ukraine's 52 million citizens still face severe economic
hardships as the country continues the transition to a decentralized
market economy. Since its 1991 independence from the former Soviet
Union, Ukraine's scientific community and emerging nonprofit sector
have been especially hard hit by decreases in traditional funding
sources. Both public and private support for nonprofits are scarce,
and budgetary problems have depleted state funding for environmental
protection. As a result, highly trained Ukrainian scientists are left
with little or no research support and often no salaried support
for months at a time. These considerations provided the motivation for a
small grants program directed to scientists and individuals from NGOs.
Meanwhile, Ukraine's natural resource base may be transformed by broader
societal changes as well. At both local and national levels, government agencies
are considering privatization of natural resources as state enterprises
are de-nationalized. This context provides an opportune and cost-effective time
to examine critical biodiversity resources for potential set aside for future
generations. These considerations were the motivation for identifying
and assessing the unique biodiversity resources of the Crimean Peninsula.
Conservation Initiatives Grants Program
Grant support to individuals and organizations
for applied conservation activities.
BSP's Conservation Initiatives Grants Program provided year-long
funding (1997-1998) to help Ukrainian scientists and NGO activists
bring needed attention to biodiversity issues. Twenty grants, ranging
from US$275 to $4,800, were provided to support the applied research
initiatives of individuals and organizations involved in in situ
conservation within existing and potential protected areas of Ukraine.
In 1998 and 1999, three of the most successful projects received
additional support to enhance their results and long-term impact.
Noteworthy Examples of Conservation Impact
In Ukraine's Carpathian region, a grant was awarded to support the
leadership of the nongovernmental society "Karpats'ka Shkola"
("Carpathian School"), joint efforts of several scientific
institutions and regional environmental bodies, and activities of
local communities. This support led to the creation of a
long-awaited protected area along the Ukrainian border that
complements adjoining protected areas in Poland and Slovakia. Known as
Nadsyanskii Regional Landscape Park, this area is an important
component of Europe's only multilateral international biosphere
reserve in the Eastern Carpathian Mountains.
In cooperation with a range of stakeholders, the Ukrainian
Society for the Protection of Birds raised
public awareness and brought high visibility to a previously
under-appreciated but unique biodiversity site in the northern
Black Sea: Dzharylgach Island and Bay. This work resulted in
the closure of unregulated public hunting and consideration of the area as
a potential protected area. BSP-supported research and outreach activites
led to the creation of a regional landscape park and broad momentum was built
for the creation of a national park. A letter signed by nearly 900 local citizens
was circulated to officials in support of protected area status. The project also
contributed to Dzharylgach becoming a focal point of interest for a World Bank-supported
project on the Black Sea-Azov Sea ecological corridor.
A research effort undertaken by the Uman subquarter of the
Kyiv Ecology-Cultural Center, an NGO in the city of Uman, led to
the successful re-introduction of a locally extinct fish species
into the Kremenchug water reservoir. Ukraine's fishery authorities
have expressed strong interest in this project's artificial
cultivation methods and are considering adopting the methods for
industrial fisheries efforts.
With BSP support to finalize the results of pertinent research
and to prepare necessary legal documents,
the boundaries of the Medobory Nature Reserve in Ternopolskii
Region were expanded to include additional areas of steppe
grassland containing unique biodiversity previously threatened
by unregulated livestock grazing.
The Odessa Socio-Ecological Union led an initiative to
prepare a feasibility study for rehabilitating important wetlands
in the Karagol Gulf ecosystem in the Dnister River delta. The study
focused on developing a methodology for renewing water exchange
between the gulf and wetlands to restore and preserve important
fisheries and bird habitat. BSP-supported
efforts (articles published in regional newspapers, meetings with
local residents, and collection of signatures protesting the construction
of fishery ponds) have contributed to broader public support for the Karagol Wetlands
as a fully functioning, biologically diverse ecosystem.
The Interagency Laboratory for the Scientific Basis for
Nature Conservation, a joint body of the National Academy of
Science and the Ministry of Ukraine for Environmental Protection
and Nuclear Safety, developed a plan to create a network for
scientific and management exchange between specially protected
areas within Ukraine and areas near the borders of adjacent countries.
Building Capacity by Raising Visibility
Beyond funding a number of other projects focused
on practical efforts in biodiversity conservation, BSP's
grants program also provided support for two periodicals: a news
bulletin on biodiversity conservation and a scientific journal,
Nature Conservation in Ukraine (Zapovidna sprava v Ukraini),
which received immediate and favorable recognition among Ukrainian
scientists and government agencies.
More than ten books and journals, some of which created
immediate interest in Ukraine and throughout the Western
European conservation community, were published as a direct
outcome of the BSP-supported grants program. In addition,
project implementors published numerous articles on the results
of work supported by BSP grants. Thanks to the visibility that
BSP helped to provide, some projects were featured in international
conservation publications. A number of grantees, encouraged by the
results and inspired by the recognition of their work, have
subsequently completed advanced scientific degrees.
Democracy Building through a Transparent Process
Beyond its direct conservation impact, the Conservation
Initiatives Grants program profoundly influenced Ukrainian
participants by demonstrating the strength and value of democratic
processes and approaches, as follows:
- The call for proposals, including selection criteria, was
widely disseminated through a variety of media.
- Grant review was discussed openly by an advisory panel of
recognized Ukrainian experts.
- The final list of recipients was published.
- Non-awardees were sent personalized letters summarizing the
comments received and the rationale behind their rejection to
ensure transparency and strengthen future grant solicitations.
- A detailed memorandum describing the selection process was
distributed among applicants, relevant government bodies, the
NGO community, and international organizations based in Ukraine,
and was published in a conservation news bulletin.
- Grantees had ongoing exchanges with advisory panel experts
throughout the implementation and review phases of the program.
Grantees and their advisors shared lessons from the grantee's
projects and considered plans for follow-on work at a March 1998
round table discussion held in Kyiv.
Role of the Advisory Panel
Close collaboration with a carefully selected advisory panel of
Ukrainian experts has been particularly fruitful. Created by BSP,
the panel was established to advise BSP, from the initial process of
selecting grantees, through project implementation, to a round table
discussion of the results of grant recipients' work. The panel
included seven well-known conservation specialists from various
geographical areas of Ukraine, representing governmental structures,
the scientific community, and NGOs. Their knowledge and moral
authority contributed greatly to the overall success of the grants
program.
Advisory panel members and grantees alike have appreciated the
potential long-term benefits of the cross-sectoral working
relationships and interactions that BSP promoted through this process.
During the round table discussion held in March 1998, grantees and
their advisors suggested that BSP's Grants Program be considered a
model for other international assistance programs. Voice of America
aired a 30-minute program in Ukraine devoted to the Grants Program,
which included interviews with grantees and advisory panel experts.
Advisory Panel Members, Their Expertise, and Contact Information
Tatyana L. Andrienko, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Chairwoman
of Interagency Laboratory of Scientific Bases of Nature Conservation
(a joint body of National Academy of Science and Ministry of Ukraine
for Environmental Protection and Nuclear Safety, located in Kyiv).
Contact: Ukraine 252001, GSP, Kyiv, Insitute of Botany, Tereshchenkivska
2; tel/fax: 38-044-212-32-20 & 293-76-32; e-mail: postmaster@ligazap.kiev.ua
Oleksandr S. Bogachov, Senior Specialist of Ecological
Safety and Protection of Population Department of the Cabinet of
Ministries of Ukraine (currently, Chief of the Unit for Nature
Protection, Ecological Safety, and Use of Natural Resources of the
Cabinet of Ministries). Contact: Ukraine 293008, Kyiv, vul.
Hrushevskogo 12/2, Cabinet of Ministries of Ukraine;
tel: 38-044-293-1651
Prof. Raisa I. Burda, Chairwoman of Flora Department of Donetsk
Botanical Garden (Donetsk). Contact: Ukraine 340003, Donetsk-3,
POB 5437; tel: 38-0622-941-280 & 941-190; e-mail: bot@hort.uvica.donetsk
Vira P. Davydok, Senior Specialist of International Relations
Department of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Nuclear
Safety of Ukraine (currently, Chief of the Department of Biological
Resources). Contact: Ukraine 252001, Kyiv -1, vul. Khreshchatyk
5, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Nuclear Safety of
Ukraine; tel: 38-044-224-2239 & 224-2404; e-mail: davydok@land.freenet.kiev.ua
Vitaliy M. Grishchenko, Ph.D, Vice President of Ornithological
Society of Ukraine (NGO); Deputy Director of the Kaniv Nature
Reserve (Kaniv, Cherkasika area). Contact: Ukraine 258300, Kaniv,
Kaniv Nature Reserve; tel: 38-04636-245-31 & 229-91; e-mail: vitaly@aquila.freenet.kiev.ua
Prof. Vasil I. Komendar, Chairman of Botany Department
at Uzhgorod State University (Uzhgorod). Contact: Ukraine 294000,
Uzhgorod, vul. Vusoka 10, apt. 16; tel: 38-03122-323-54
Ivan T. Rusev, Ph.D, President of the nongovernmental organization,
Natural Heritage Fund (Odessa). Contact: Ukraine 270053, Odessa,
vul. Geroev Stalingrada 30, apt 26; tel/fax: 38-0482-52-28-05;
e-mail: wildlife@paco.odessa.ua
Conservation Needs Assessment for Crimea
Using participatory processes to establish priorities for
protecting biodiversity in the Crimean Peninsula.
Crimea, a large peninsula off the southern coast of Ukraine
jutting into the Black Sea, comprises steppe grasslands,
mixed steppe and forests belts, and forested mountains with unique
high-mountain meadow areas. The peninsula's flora and fauna reflect
a mix of temperate and boreal species with Mediterranean influence
along the coast. High endemism, particularly of vegetation, and
strategic location on the bird migratory corridors between Central
Asia and Africa, make Crimea an important priority for biodiversity
conservation.
The Conservation Needs Assessment Workshop, sometimes referred to
as the Gurzuf Workshop, sought to facilitate an open and transparent
discussion among relevant stakeholders in Crimean and central
government agencies, scientific institutions, and NGOs about the
status of, threats facing, and actions needed to conserve Crimea's
biodiversity. After a year and a half of preparatory work, more
than 100 representatives of those institutions met in November
1997 in Gurzuf, Crimea.
In addition to invited participants, many other people were able to participate
as a result of the Gurzuf Workshop accessibility to the public, with daily
transport provided to the nearby capital city of Simferopol. The Gurzuf
Workshop focused on setting (1) geographic priorities to identify
where conservation activity should be undertaken and (2) thematic
priorities to determine what conservation actions should be taken.
At the conclusion of the workshop, a Ukrainian working group
was formed to compile proceedings and follow-up recommendations.
BSP and the working group subsequently produced a book entitled
Priority-setting in Conservation: A New Approach for Crimea,
which documents the findings and results of the Gurzuf Workshop.
The dual-language book (Russian/English) includes a series of
GIS-based maps of the Crimean peninsula that identify consensus
priority areas for in-situ biodiversity conservation in Crimea
and form the basis for planning efforts, conservation activities,
and research priorities for the future.
Representative Results
- Fifty priority sites, totaling 598,130 hectares, were identified
as potential conservation areas deserving conservation status
and ranked by relative priority into three groups.
- These fifty sites were mapped to show their location and clearly
delineated proposed boundaries.
- Distribution of major taxonomic groups and existing and
proposed protected areas were mapped.
- Actions were proposed to mitigate existing threats to biodiversity.
- These proposed actions were organized to address Crimea-wide threats,
as well as threats affecting major habitat zones and specific priority
sites.
- This priority-setting exercise, with its emphasis on
multidisciplinary and multisectoral participation,
open deliberations, and transparent decision-making
became a valuable demonstration of democratic processes and
values, as well as a conservation initiative.
Formation of a New NGO
The Association for Promoting Biological and Habitat Diversity in Crimea was
formed independently by participants of the Gurzuf Workshop during the
last year of BSP's involvement in Crimea to promote
the results and findings of the Crimean Conservation Needs Assesment.
Comprising 14 individual NGOs, the association dedicated itself to promoting
action based on the findings of the Gurzuf Workshop in a manner consistent with
BSP's style of operation, which stressed broad participation, open and
transparent deliberations, and multi-disciplinary involvement.
With a follow-on grant awarded by BSP, the association conducted detailed reconnaissance of all
fifty priority sites identified in the assessment. Small teams of association members
met with local communities in the vicinity of priority sites, where they
explained the process and findings of the priority setting exercise.
Copies of the final publication were presented for inclusion in the local library.
Local leaders, government officials, and community members were encouraged to
ask questions and share their views, as well as learn about the significance
of their local natural area and the rationale behind its selection as a
priority site. Sites were surveyed and mapped, local threats to biodiversity
identified, and potential follow-up assessed. In most cases, community meetings
were covered by local and regional news media.
From the BSP Library
Biodiversity Support Program. 1999. Priority-setting in conservation.
A new approach for Crimea (in English and Russian, with summaries
in Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar). Washington, D.C.: Biodiversity
Support Program (pub
no. 47).
Biodiversity in Crimea: Assessment and needs for
conservation (in Russian or Ukrainian). 1997.
Working papers presented at an international workshop
(November 1997, Gurzuf). Simferopol, Crimea:
Biodiversity Support Program.
Additional Resources
Association for Promoting Biological and Habitat
Diversity in Crimea - "Gurzuf-97"
USAID Mission in Kyiv, Ukraine
Russian Conservation News
WWF, Global 200 Ecoregions
WRI, Regional Resources: Europe and Russia
USAID, E&E Bureau, Environment and Natural Resources Division