Location and General Description
The Namibian savanna woodland (Namaland) ecoregion covers the narrow escarpment belt that lies inland of the Namib and Kaokoveld Deserts and broadens gradually towards the south, where it comprises extensive areas on the plateau south of Windhoek. The ecoregion extends from near the town of Sumbe in western Angola down through Namibia, with the southern boundary located just north of Groot Karas Berg.
Rainfall in this ecoregion is low. Its annual range is from 60 mm in the west to 200 mm in the east (Barnard 1998). Most of the rain falls as thundershowers in the summer months, from October to March. There is great variation between years, with the driest years having the least predictable rainfall. The predictability of the rainfall increases towards the east. The low humidity of the area, without the cooling effect of the Benguela Current, results in extreme temperatures. Mean minimum monthly temperatures drop to -9°C in places, and absolute readings are even lower. Winter frosts are common. The mean maximum monthly air temperature can exceed 40°C (Lovegrove 1993).
The ecoregion is a transition zone between the low-lying desert and the central highland plateau. The escarpment that rises from the deserts is narrow, broken and deeply dissected. It includes the Brandberg, Namibia’s highest mountain at 2,038 m. Other mountains such as the Baynes (2,038 m), Erongo (2,319 m), Naukluft (1,974 m), Spitzkoppe (1,759 m) and the Gamsberg (2,347 m) also lie along the escarpment edge. Towards the south, the ecoregion broadens to include the rocky central plateau. This plateau lies above and east of the escarpment, between about 1,000 m and 2,000 m. It is stony and flat in places, and it is dramatically mountainous in others. To the west of the town of Windhoek, it includes the Hochland Plateau that varies from rugged in the north (with broad valleys and inselbergs) to a flat and stony plateau dissected by deep valleys in the south. Finally, the Kalahari sandveld stretches southeast from the central plateau, with deep sands overlaying bedrock. In contrast to the rugged and stony land to the northwest, most of the sandveld is extremely flat (Barnard 1998).
Soils differ markedly within the ecoregion, with litholithic and sandy loams on the escarpment and the southwestern part of the plateau, and deep, red or pale, sandy (and to some extent calcareous and silty) soils in the southern Kalahari (Barnard 1998).
Most of the rivers in Namibia have their major watersheds in this highland (Barnard 1998). The Kunene River that runs along the Angola-Namibia border is the only perennial river within the ecoregion. Other important rivers are the Swakop, Kuiseb, and Fish Rivers. The Swakop and Kuiseb Rivers flow infrequently and are usually dry riverbeds. The Fish River, one of Namibia’s longest rivers, begins in the Naukluft Mountains southwest of Windhoek and winds its way south for 800 km before flowing into the Orange River.
The vegetation of the Namibian savanna woodland is varied in structure, physiognomy and species distribution. This reflects diverse topographic factors and related soil and microclimate characteristics (Werger 1978; Giess 1971; White 1983). According to Geiss’ vegetation map of Namibia (1971), the ecoregion contains three vegetation types: mopane savanna, semi-desert and savanna transition, and dwarf shrub savanna. The mopane savanna lies to the north of the ecoregion and is characterized by Colophospermum mopane. This species occurs as a tree or shrub, depending on local conditions. In some areas, it forms dense woodland, whereas in others it grows as a short-stemmed shrub intermingled with scattered trees. In the western part, towards the Kaokoveld Desert, the mopane is confined to depressions and riverbeds where it often grows together with Balanites welwitschii. Other components of the mopane savanna are two species of Sosamothamnus. S. benguellensis occurs along the Kunene River, and S. guerichii is well-distributed over the mopane savanna. Ceraria longipedunculata is typical of the mountainous areas to the west of the mopane savanna.
The mopane savanna extends as far south as the vicinity of the Brandberg; it then grades into the semi-desert and savanna transition zone. This zone is characterized by a great variety of species, many of which are endemic. Typical of the area is Euphorbia guerichiana, a shrub or small tree with conspicuous, shiny, brownish-yellow, papery bark growing to a height of 5 m. Also common are Cyphostemma spp. with succulent stems, Adenolobus spp., the quiver tree (Aloe dichotoma), and Moringa ovalifolia. Two species of Acacia are confined to this vegetation type; these are the Brandberg acacia (Acacia montis-ustii) and A. robynsiana. Acacia senegal and A. tortilis are also found, mainly in the alluvial sands and silts along ephemeral rivers in the ecoregion. High diversity of the genus Commiphora is particularly characteristic of both the mopane savanna to the north and the semi-desert and savanna transition zone. To the south, the vegetation becomes more open, is dominated by karoo shrubs and grasses, and is classified as dwarf shrub savanna. This vegetation type extends eastwards into the Kalahari Xeric Savanna ecoregion. Rhigozum trichotomum is a very characteristic shrub of this vegetation type. Parkinsonia africana, Acacia nebrownii, Boscia foetida, B. albitrunca, and Catophractes alexandri as well as smaller karoo bushes such as Pentzia spp. and Eriocephalus spp. are also typical. Tufted grasses, mainly Stipagrostis spp., are found scattered between the woody plants. On rocky ridges, the conspicuous quiver tree becomes very abundant. Near Keetmanshoop there is a quiver tree forest of about 300 trees. This forest is a national monument. Trees such as Acacia giraffe, A. karroo, Tamarix usneoides, Euclea pseudebenus, and Rhus lancea are found along the riverbeds throughout the ecoregion.
Namibia has two distinct hotspots, defined as areas of high endemism and high species richness. One is the Sperregebiet region, located in the southwest of the country in the Succulent Karoo ecoregion, and the second is the Kaoko Escarpment in the far northwest (Simmons et al. 1998). The northern area of this ecoregion encompasses the Kaoko Escarpment and is therefore rich in species and endemics. Most of the endemics are clustered around the Brandberg Mountain and around the Khomas highlands north of Windhoek. The Brandberg Mountain supports 90 of Namibia’s endemic plants and eight plants that are only found there (Maggs et al. 1998). The high altitude of this isolated relict inselberg and the cool, moist conditions at its summit could explain the high level of endemism found in this region. Two of the most striking plants of the Brandberg Mountain are the Brandberg acacia (Acacia montis-usti) and the Brandberg euphorbia (Euphorbia monteiroi subsp. brandbergensis) (Nordenstam 1974).
The Khomas region contains Namibia’s second highest mountain, the Auasberg, at 2,479 m, and it is in a transitional arid region, representing ideal conditions for speciation of desert plants. There are 68 endemic plants in this region (Simmons et al. 1998). Other endemics and near-endemics found within the ecoregion as a whole are Panicum arbusculum, Stachys burchelliana, Schotia afra, Berkheya chamaepeuce, Barleria lichtensteiniana, Euphorbia gariepina, E. gregaria, E. avasmontana, Zygophyllum dregeanum, and Z. microcarpum (Werger 1978). The ecoregion has many interesting, well-defined species that are taxonomically isolated, for example, the monotypic genera Phlyctidocarpa and Kaokochloa (Poaceae) (Maggs et al. 1994). Other well-defined species include Acacia robynsiana, Balanites welwitschii, and Petalidium spp. Intense recent speciation has occurred within the Petalidium genus.
According to Maggs et al. (1998) more than 25 of the species recorded by Nordenstam (1974) for the Brandberg Mountain are probably the remains of an old arid flora, and have disjunct distributions among the arid areas of the Karoo-Namib region and the Saharan area of the Sudano-Zambezian region. The most widely accepted explanation for these present-day disjunct distributions is that they are relicts from a previously continuous arid belt stretching across Africa from Somalia to Botswana, Namibia and South Africa (Werger 1978).
The Namibian Savanna Woodland ecoregion is also a center of high faunal endemism and species richness. The ecoregion has a significantly larger number of Namibian endemic invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds than adjacent ecoregions (Simmons et al. 1998). This distribution suggests relict populations isolated, perhaps, by low desert temperatures and mobile sands on the coastal plains, isolating rocky habitats and promoting speciation. Further inland, oscillating patterns of regional rainfall and global temperature may have isolated species on rocky islands and inselbergs (Simmons et al. 1998).
Endemic and near-endemic mammals are comprised of mainly bats, rodents, and small carnivores. The slender mongoose (Galerella swalius) and the rock mouse (Petromyscus shortridgei) are restricted to the Namaland escarpment. A further six species of small mammal and bat are also near-endemic to the ecoregion, including the Angola wing-gland bat (Myotis seabrai, VU) and the bat Laephotis namibensis, EN (Hilton-Taylor 2000). The only large mammal endemic to this region is the mountain zebra (Equus zebra hartmannae, EN), which is near-endemic to the ecoregion, and is the only large mammal endemic to Namibia.
Among the larger mammals the ecoregion is well-known for its desert-dwelling populations of elephant (Loxodonta africana, EN) and black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis, CR) (Joubert and Mostert 1975; Hilton-Taylor 2000). The black rhino population in this area is one of the few unfenced populations of black rhinos in the world, and it is estimated to number more than 100 individuals (Berger and Cunningham 1994). Other large mammal species found within the ecoregion are kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros LR), springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis LR), gemsbok (Oryx gazella LR), Damara dik-diks (Madoqua kirkii), and black-faced impala (Aepyceros melampus petersi VU). Predators include lion (Panthera leo), leopard (Panthera pardus), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus VU), bat-eared fox, (Otocyon megalotis) and Cape fox (Vulpes chama).
Seven reptiles are strictly endemic to the ecoregion. Albert’s burrowing skink (Sepsina alberti) is an interesting pale green skink with a bright blue tail that is restricted to the northern area of the ecoregion. In total, four lizards, a gecko, a skink and a tortoise are specialists to this habitat: Husaben sand lizard (Pedioplanis husabensis), Namaqua spinytail lizard (Cordylus namaquensis), Campbell's spinytail lizard (Cordylus campbelli), Herero girdled lizard (Cordylus pustulatus), Brandberg thick-toed gecko, Albert's skink, and Nama padloper (Homopus sp. nov). Around 50 reptile species are either endemic or near-endemic reptiles in the ecoregion. Of these, 83 percent occur on and around the Brandberg, suggesting relict populations (Simmons et al. 1998). For example, the Brandberg thick-toed gecko (Pachydactylus gaiasensis) is restricted to the Brandberg (Branch 1998). Only two amphibians are considered endemic to the ecoregion, the Okahandja toad (Bufo hoeschi) and the Mossamedes toad (B. grandisonae).
The Kaoko Escarpment that makes up this ecoregion has the highest level of avian diversity in Namibia, with 297 bird species recorded to date. Most of the avifauna is restricted to the rocky habitats of the ecoregion and is found at elevations of between 600 m and 1,200 m. Five birds are endemic or near-endemic to this ecoregion: including the Karoo chat (Cercomela schlegelii), tractrac chat (Cercomela tractrac), greybacked cisticola (Cisticola subruficapillus), and the herero chat (Namibornis herero). All the near-endemic species except the Cinderella waxbill (Estrilda thomensis) are restricted to rocky habitats. The Cinderella waxbill is found in the wetter area of southern Angola, entering the ecoregion down the Kunene River (Simmons et al. 1998).
Namibia’s recent biodiversity assessment (Barnard 1998) identified priority conservation areas in the country. The Kaoko Escarpment in the northern part of this ecoregion is an endemism hotspot, and it also has immense value in both cultural and scenic wilderness terms. It represents one of the most significant gaps in habitat protection within Namibia, and it is a top-priority area for urgent biodiversity protection measures (Rebelo 1994, Barnard et al., 1998). Presently there are only two small protected areas: the Damaraland Wilderness Reserve (1,600 km2) and the Brandberg National Monument (Stuart and Stuart 1992). The area was once part of "Game Reserve No. 2," which originally covered 80,000 km2 and was the largest nature reserve in the world. It stretched from the Kunene River, 200 km south to the Hoarusib River and included this escarpment and the coastal plain (Barnard et al. 1998). This enormous park allowed for the westward seasonal migration of elephants, lions and other mammals as far as the Atlantic Ocean. In 1963, the Odendaal Commission of Enquiry into South West Africa Affairs re-allocated land to ethnically partitioned homelands to promote the ideology of separate development. Game Reserve No. 2 was reduced by 72 percent to become the present Etosha Pan National Park (with a size of 22,912 km2).
The south of this ecoregion is also poorly protected. A small portion of the Namib-Naukluft National Park extends into the ecoregion to include the Naukluft Mountains (southwest of Windhoek) (Stuart and Stuart 1992).
Other forms of protection, such as conservancies, private nature reserves and game farms add largely to the current protection of the area. Conservancies are jointly managed for resource conservation by multiple landowners with financial and other benefits shared among them. They occur on private and communal (tribal) land. Most aim to enhance habitat for, and numbers of, game species, such as ungulates and game birds to draw income from tourism ventures (Barnard et al. 1998). A large communal conservancy was submitted for formal gazetting in 1997. It stretches along the eastern boundary of the Skeleton Coast National Park, in the area previously occupied by Game Reserve No. 2. The proximity of the Skeleton Coast Park and Etosha Park offers considerable benefits to rural communities, making ecotourism and conservancy management an attractive land-use option. The formation of conservancies has been stimulated by the government’s recent policy to return resource management rights to conservancy committees with an approved constitution (Barnard et al. 1998). There are some private nature reserves and game farms in the area. Game farming is increasing in popularity, partly because much of the area is only marginally suitable for livestock. Although game farms are sometimes intensively managed to promote selected game species, using fire and chemical control of woody vegetation, their biodiversity conservation value is perceived to be higher than that of livestock farming (Barnard et al. 1998).
Types and Severity of Threats
On an ecoregion scale, many species such as springboks, leopards and gemsboks have not suffered significant range reductions, and the distributions of smaller mammals have changed little during recorded history. A few species, like the greater kudu and the Damara dik-dik have even benefited from bush encroachment. The establishment of artificial water sources and reduced predator numbers has increased distributions of these species. (Griffin 1998). While bush encroachment has benefited these species, it leads to a reduction in diversity and is therefore not seen as positive for conservation within the ecoregion.
Severe overhunting of game mammals on private land was a major threat to wildlife for the first half of the century, but this was significantly reversed in 1967 when legislation shifted the ownership of game from the state to the individual landowner. This allowed landowners to commercialize game rather than incur losses through competition of game with livestock (Griffin, M. 1998). The Nature Conservation Amendment Act of 1992 extends similar fundamental rights to people living in communal areas, with the hope that rural dwellers will realize the value of wildlife and manage it sustainably. The conservation status of all Namibian mammals is now under review and, as an interim measure, a list of species with provisional conservation status rankings has been produced (Griffin 1998). Many of the species do not have sufficient data to evaluate them and place them into categories. Thus, the interim status confers a high level of protection until the species can be confidently assessed.
After the deproclaimation of Game Reserve No. 2 in 1963, the northern areas of Namaland were administered from afar by the Department of Bantu Affairs in Pretoria. This was a period of corruption and widespread poaching. This poaching problem has continued and is a present-day threat to the wildlife of the ecoregion, especially to the unfenced black rhino population. In an attempt to control poaching, these rhinos are being de-horned (Berger and Cullingham 1994) and have also been previously translocated to the Etosha Pan National Park (Hofmeyer et al. 1975).
Plant poaching by collectors of succulent species is impacting the flora of the ecoregion. Illegal trade in spectacular succulent species is believed to be considerable (Maggs et al. 1998).
Farming practices in Namibia vary widely in their environmental impact. Poor land management through overstocking has led to soil erosion, loss of grass species diversity, and bush encroachment. Numerous livestock and game farmers in Namibia, however, practice exemplary land management. However, this is expensive and such practices have been jeopardized by uncertainty about impending land reform, particularly at the time of independence in 1990 (Barnard et al. 1998). A study by Sullivan and Konstant (1997) carried out in the Kunene region to the north of this ecoregion shows that communal farming has a negative effect on the vegetation through overgrazing, browsing and cutting for firewood. They conclude, however, that this effect is on a local scale and should not be extrapolated to the ecoregion as a whole. They also note that Colophospemum mopane has remarkable coppicing ability and that it is extremely resilient to these practices on an individual and population level, even though it is sought after for poles and firewood.
Lastly, the Namaland escarpment has recently become a popular destination for off-road enthusiasts. While this may have advantages in bringing tourism into the area, many off-road drivers have proven to show no regard to the sensitive environments in which they are driving.
Justification of Ecoregion Delineation
This ecoregion is largely based on the ‘bushy Karoo-Namib shrubland’ of White (1983) and also includes a small transition area of ‘Colophospermum mopane scrub woodland to Karoo-Namib shrubland.’ This woodland ecoregion stops about 50 km from the coast compared to White’s vegetation unit, although the northern limit is the same. The southern limit stops north of Groot Karasberg, near Keetmanshoop roughly around the 900 m contour (WWF 1998). This ecoregion is characterized by faunal and floristic elements of both the Namib and Kalahari.
Barnard, P. editor. 1998. Biological Diversity in Namibia. Namibian National Biodiversity Task Force, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Windhoek.
Barnard, P., C. J. Brown, A. M. Jarvis, and A. Robertson. 1998. Extending the Namibian protected areas network to safeguard hotspots of endemism and diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 531-547.
Berger, J., and C. Cullingham. 1994. Active intervention and conservation: Africa’s pachyderm problem. Science 263: 1241-1242.
Branch, B. 1998. Field Guide to the Snakes and Other Reptiles of Southern Africa. Struik, Cape Town.
Giess, W. 1971. A preliminary vegetation map of South West Africa. Dintera 4: 1-114.
Griffin, M. 1998. The species diversity, distribution and conservation of Namibian mammals. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 483-494.
Hilton-Taylor, C. compiler. 2000. The IUCN 2000 Red List of threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hofmeyer, J. M., H. Ebedes, R. E. M. Fryer, and J. R. de Bruine. 1975. The capture and translocation of the black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis in South West Africa. Madoqua 9(2): 35-44.
Joubert, E., and P. K. N. Mostert. 1975. Distribution patterns and status of mammals in South West Africa. Madoqua 9(1): 8-22.
Lovegrove, B. 1993. The Living Deserts of Southern Africa. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg
Maggs, G. L., H. H. Kolberg, and C. J. H. Hines. 1994. Botanical diversity in Namibia – an overview. Pages 93 – 104 in B. J. Huntley, editor. Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1.
Maggs, G. L., P. Craven, and H. H. Kolberg. 1998. Plant species richness, endemism and genetic resources in Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 435-446.
Nordenstam, B. 1974. Flora of the Brandberg. Dintera 11: 1-67.
Rebelo, A. G. 1994. Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. Pages 231 – 254 in B. J. Huntley, editor. Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1.
Simmons, R. E., M. Griffin, R. E. Griffin, E. Marais, and H. Kolberg. 1998. Endemism in Namibia: patterns, process and predictions. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 513-530.
Stuart, C., and Stuart, T. 1992. Guide to Southern African Game and Nature Reserves. Struik, Cape Town.
Sullivan, S., and Konstant, T. L. 1997. Human impacts on woody vegetation and multivariate analysis: a case study based on data from Khowarib settlement, Kunene Region. Dintera 25: 87-120.
Werger, M. J. A. 1978. Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
White, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa, a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa (3 Plates, Northwestern Africa, Northeastern Africa, and Southern Africa, 1:5,000,000). UNESCO, Paris.
WWF. 1998. A conservation assessment of terrestrial ecoregions of Africa: Draft proceedings of a workshop, Cape Town, South Africa, August 1998. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Prepared by: Amy Spriggs
Reviewed by: In progress