TNRC Original Research
Peru, Madagascar, and Vietnam
Using a political ecology approach (combining analysis of environmental change with political-economy and ethnographic analysis), teams of international and locally-based researchers led by the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Center studied select conservation projects in Peru, Madagascar, and Vietnam. This analysis addressed the fundamental TNRC research question, "What factors condition anti-corruption success and failure in renewable resource sectors?" Primary data was collected, including over 300 field interviews, participant observation and surveys. The cases examined included a multi-sector case of community-led natural resource management in northern Madagascar; community forestry reforms to tackle illegal logging and associated corruption in the Peruvian Amazon; and the use of e-payments in Vietnam's forest sector.This country-based analysis was complemented with secondary data, including a systematic literature review of over 900 publications, reviews of official documentation, and environmental change data on deforestation. Five recommendations emerged for conservation practitioners and donors scaling efforts to target natural resource corruption: (1) further strengthen corruption risk analysis and management approaches in conservation; (2) promote and facilitate donor coordination at the global, regional, and country levels on environmental corruption; (3) further engage with and support civil society and journalists working on environmental corruption; (4) safeguard young and Indigenous human rights defenders calling out environmental corruption; and (5) bolster data availability for transnational law enforcement on environmental corruption. More information can be found in the publications below.
U4 Brief | E-payments in Vietnam’s forest sector: An effective anti-corruption innovation?
This Brief presents evidence from field research on whether, and under which conditions, payment for forest environmental services (PFES) e-payments help to reduce the potential for corruption in benefit distribution. Since 2018, an electronic payment mechanism for PFES has been introduced by the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID’s) Vietnam Forest and Delta Program (VFD Phase 2) to tackle the risks associated with cash. The introduction of forest sector e-payments has been viewed as promising in theory--it is more efficient, secure, and transparent than cash, reducing costs and streamlining payments. The goal is to contribute to the further improvement of PFES management and sustainability in Vietnam and to examine current issues challenging the success of the PFES e–payment system.
U4 Issue | Corruption, informality and power: Explaining the limits to institutional approaches for tackling illegal logging in Peru
Policies and strategies implemented to combat illegal logging in Peru appear to have had limited success. This paper explores the topic of corruption as a facilitator of deforestation in Peru and argues that addressing it requires an understanding of the role of political and informal power arrangements that shape individual and collective behaviors. In addition, it emphasizes that forest governance outcomes can only be strengthened by considering the networks, actors, powers, and interests that interact with wider conditions.
Malawi, Uganda and Peru
The Basel Institute on Governance is leveraging its considerable experience working on the nexus of corruption and IWT, particularly its hands-on relationships with wildlife management and anti-corruption authorities, to deliver a multi-year research initiative focused on corruption risks in the investigation and prosecution of wildlife crime. The first phase of work involved field research to map corruption risks in the prosecution chains in Peru, Malawi and Uganda and to develop recommendations for partners in those countries. Further research examined how strengthening internal controls can help to prevent corruption behind natural resource crimes.
How political economy analysis can support corruption risk assessments to strengthen law enforcement against wildlife crimes
This practice note summarizes the value added and key insights of using two analytical approaches, political economy analysis and corruption risk assessment, to help natural resource management and conservation practitioners understand corruption risks in specific contexts and design and implement mitigation measures. These techniques take prevailing political and power dynamics into account and help identify windows of opportunity for addressing corruption risks and highlight strategically important stakeholders that may support or oppose the intervention.
Using political economy analysis to support corruption risk assessments that strengthen law enforcement against wildlife crime
In this TNRC Learning Series webinar, hosted by the Basel Institute on Governance, the authors of the TNRC Practice Note How political economy analysis can support corruption risk assessments to strengthen law enforcement against wildlife crimes share insights on the utility and implementation of political economy analysis (PEA) to inform corruption risk assessments that strengthen law enforcement against wildlife crime. Their experience is a resource for practitioners who seek to incorporate corruption risk assessment into their programming to combat wildlife crime.
Where are the weakest links in the illegal wildlife trade enforcement chain? Lessons from corruption risk assessments with agencies in three countries
This note has a dual focus. First, it summarizes experiences and lessons from conducting CRAs with authorities responsible for investigations and prosecutions of IWT cases in three countries in Africa and Latin America. It seeks to demonstrate the value of adopting a collaborative approach to CRAs, illustrates potential avenues for pursuing such an approach when the right factors are in place, and demonstrates how mapping the criminal justice process provides a solid starting point to identify critical vulnerabilities. Second, this note highlights some common risks that emerged from the CRAs in the three countries and that may negatively affect the progress of IWT cases in other countries.
Lessons from the field: Assessing corruption risks that undermine law enforcement action against natural resource crimes
In this TNRC Learning Series webinar, hosted by the Basel Institute on Governance, the authors of the TNRC Practice Note Where are the weakest links in the illegal wildlife trade enforcement chain? Lessons from corruption risk assessments with agencies in three countries join leading experts to discuss how corruption risk assessments can improve law enforcement outcomes and strengthen conservation and natural resource management by helping to inform the design of interventions that prevent corruption from undermining investigations and prosecutions.
Internal controls and illegal wildlife trade: A systemic approach to corruption prevention and law enforcement integrity
This brief highlights the importance and potential of robust internal controls in helping achieve the objectives of agencies tasked with protecting wildlife and the environment by identifying performance gaps and opportunities for improvement, enabling oversight, and fostering accountability. However, in some countries, internal controls are not always applied to wildlife-related corruption or even natural resource management. Conservation or anti-corruption partners can help government institutions strengthen their systems of internal controls, building on procedures already in place. Well-designed systems of internal controls can discourage corrupt behavior and mitigate other risks to wildlife and natural resources. While no system can completely eliminate the potential for corrupt behavior, enhancing internal controls can help close the implementation gap between agency objectives and what happens in practice.
Can strengthening internal controls prevent corruption behind natural resource crimes?
In this TNRC Learning Series webinar, hosted by the Basel Institute on Governance, the authors of the TNRC Topic Brief Internal controls and illegal wildlife trade: A systemic approach to corruption prevention and law enforcement integrity join leading experts to discuss how the use of internal controls may help prevent the corruption that often accompanies illegal wildlife trade and natural resource crimes. The speakers describe the results of a three-country pilot study and addressed learning questions related to: a) how assessments of internal control systems can help practitioners achieve objectives; b) the current state of natural resource management (NRM) internal controls as observed in the study; and c) implications for future NRM programming and recommendations for the future.
The Basel Institute is also drawing on its research on social norms that drive corruption in IWT to partner with TRAFFIC to deliver a multi-year package of work researching and testing behavioral approaches for reducing corruption in natural resource sectors.
Harnessing big data to uncover corruption in the forestry sector
How can big data help address corruption in the forestry sector? New research undertaken by data analysts and financial flows experts at TRAFFIC and the Basel Institute on Governance under the Targeting Natural Resource Corruption project is testing new methods for automating data collection and analysis techniques used in other sectors to identify corrupt actors from the point of allocation of forest access rights. This blog post captures expert insights and responses to practitioner questions raised in a TNRC Learning Series Webinar on this topic.
Can conservation organizations use big data analytics to tackle corruption in the forestry sector?
Under the TNRC project, TRAFFIC is exploring whether big data techniques can be used to identify corruption occurring in the timber sector, specifically at the point where government agencies allocate companies the rights to harvest resources. The data flow model outlined in this blog post offers a ‘preview’ of further insights shared in a TNRC Learning Series Webinar in 2022.
Image attribution: © naturepl.com / Jen Guyton / WWF; © Brian J. Skerry / National Geographic Stock / WWF; © Georgina Goodwin / Shoot The Earth / WWF-UK; © Hkun Lat / WWF-Aus