Today the business case for renewable energy is clear.
“Many companies are very motivated by wanting to do the right thing,” says Letha Tawney, director of utility innovation at WRI’s Electricity Initiative. “But it sure helps—and makes the whole effort more sustainable in the long term economically—if they’re deriving a business benefit.”
Tawney recalls watching the price of renewables falling during 2012 and 2013. “We looked at that and thought, ‘Our entire renewable energy strategy needs to change,’” she says. “And we saw a shift in the corporate buyer’s strategy: Now a CFO is interested because it makes business sense, not because it’s good PR, though that’s important, too.”
Today, top corporate decision-makers are becoming sophisticated players in electricity markets. And they’re thinking about price certainty. Fossil fuel-based electricity prices are volatile; with wind and solar energy, once a facility is built, long-term prices are essentially locked in, because the ongoing cost of the “fuel” (the wind and the sun) is zero.
Taking advantage of lower power costs and locking in those lower prices, says Tawney, makes corporate buyers more competitive. It also expands the number of people at the table advocating for renewable energy technologies.
Every renewable energy project has direct and indirect impacts on the market and economy, says Lily Donge, a principal with RMI who leads the Business Renewables Center. As electricity from wind and solar energy continues to become even cheaper, and technologies continue to improve, the free market will drive more project expansion. And every time companies demand new wind and solar projects, she says, they’re also creating new jobs and boosting local economies.
“There’s a ripple effect: A company’s customers and employees can become increasingly aligned on a common vision” says Donge. That’s a fairly new phenomenon, she says.
Accelerating Change
Facebook was involved in discussions about the Buyers’ Principles from the beginning. “Our business is all about connecting people,” says Bill Weihl, Facebook’s sustainability director. “Running those services requires significant infrastructure that uses a lot of energy, and we’re committed to powering all that connectivity with the smallest footprint possible.”
The company had worked privately with WWF and WRI in the past, he says, but it wanted to do more. It didn’t want to just sign on to another letter or statement of support. Its employees wanted the company to create change directly. About five years ago, says Weihl, Facebook committed to powering its infrastructure with 100% clean energy. And while no one expects the change to occur overnight, they do want it done quickly, while also adding meaningful amounts of renewable energy to the grid.
When looking to build a new data center, for example, the company isn’t just looking for land or a workforce—Facebook also wants assurances that the region’s utility can supply renewable energy. And not just for itself. “When we move into a new area, we’re not just looking for a contract for ourselves: We like to see market access open up to as many other companies as possible,” says Weihl. “When we or other companies have gone into North Carolina or Oregon to build data centers, other companies tend to follow.”
That’s where REBA and the Buyers’ Principles come in, says Weihl. Facebook found it could get further, faster, by working with other companies than by trying to do it on its own.
Like Facebook, General Motors (GM) uses a lot of energy. Each year, the company spends about a billion dollars on utilities, including water, gas, and electricity, says David Tulauskas, GM’s director of sustainability. “We’re always looking at reducing that cost,” he says.
Tulauskas, too, has been part of REBA discussions since the beginning. “If you build it, we will come,” he jokes, pointing out that during early discussions with WWF and WRI, a lot of time was spent talking about “pain points” that would need to be alleviated to create a more harmonized, systematic approach to procuring more renewable energy.
In 2016, GM completed its largest green energy purchase to date—making all of its facilities in Texas powered by renewable energy. “And we’ve made a commitment to go 100% renewable energy by 2050,” says Tulauskas, adding that renewable energy has been a “mainstream option” for GM for a long time. The company implemented its first low-carbon energy project, a landfill gas project at one of its factories, more than 20 years ago. And the company has accelerated its use of renewable energy for a couple of reasons, including GM’s significant focus on addressing climate change. The company wants to be a part of the solution, he says, especially as the transportation industry shifts toward the use of electrified vehicles.
“We want to make sure the grid is cleaner, because it maximizes the benefits of electrified vehicles,” he says. “We don’t want to transfer the problems from our tailpipes to smokestacks, so we’re taking kind of a holistic approach.”
He says the Buyers’ Principles laid out what could be done more consistently, what could be standardized, and how companies and utilities could streamline renewable energy projects.