Examining social accountability as an anti-corruption approach in conservation and natural resource management
Elizabeth Hart, Targeting Natural Resource Corruption, WWF-US with case contributions by Althea Skinner, Socially Inclusive Conservation, WWF-US
In conservation and natural resource management (NRM), corrupt actions help actors seeking private gain and advantage to sidestep, derail, or even dismantle policies and processes for sustainable management of resources. These actions can take place at the source, when resources are traded, and/or where they are used or consumed. Corruption can be systemic – shaping nearly every aspect of how decisions governing resources are made – and it can also manifest in more singular or opportunistic individual actions and decisions. Importantly, it can exist at any level of a landscape or jurisdiction (country, province, etc.) and it can be related to any formal or informal authorities and functions.
As community-based or inclusive conservation objectives have gained prominence as strategies to achieve and sustain conservation and NRM outcomes, the impact of corruption in local resource management processes has also grown in importance. When local communities, Indigenous peoples, and other actors at national or sub-national levels seek to manage their forests, fisheries, and wildlife resources, they can encounter significant challenges caused by corruption.
---
This content is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, or individual TNRC consortium members.
-
Examining social accountability as an anti-corruption approach in conservation and natural resource management
1.0 MB PDF Download